By the end of this task, you will be able to turn a customer objection into a comparison your manager can decide from, with every assumption behind it named and testable.
Your situation
Lidia Holloway said it in the room, in front of the VP who signs: "We've had two bad Decembers. I'm being asked to pay to fix something that should already work." She was talking about Peak Season Planning, priced at $9,500 in your proposal.
Lynne Robbins took it. She promised an answer inside two weeks, which means she needs one from you inside one.
There are three live options: bundle it into the recovery work at no charge, hold the price as proposed, or defer it to next peak. Each costs something different, and each rests on an assumption about a pattern repeating.
Important
Deliverable: a one-page decision note with the recommendation first, three options compared, and the assumption each one depends on stated plainly.
Files you'll use
| File | What's in it |
|---|---|
| CanadaPost_Service_Catalog.md | What Peak Season Planning is and what it costs |
| CanadaPost_Parcel_Performance.xlsx | The twelve months of national performance, including the November–December dip |
| CanadaPost_Review_Meeting_Transcript.md | The objection, in her words |
| Your proposal from Task 7 | What was actually put in front of her |
How to read the prompts
Each prompt below is one block you can copy whole. The # lines are labels, not instructions — they mark where the prompt stops setting the goal and starts giving the context, the sources, and the expectations. Copying them along with the prompt does no harm.
Those four moves, in that order, are what makes a prompt work. Use the same shape when you write your own.
Steps
Open Excel and attach the service catalogue and the national performance workbook.
Build the comparison.
Prompt t9-a goalBuild me an options comparison for the peak season service the customer pushed back on.
contextAt the March review their procurement manager said she is being asked to pay to fix something that should already work. My sales manager promised an answer inside two weeks. The three live options are to bundle it into the recovery work at no charge, to hold the price as proposed, or to defer it to next peak.
sourcesUse the service catalogue, the twelve months of national performance, and the meeting transcript.
expectationsOne row per option, with what it costs us, what it costs them, what it fixes, and what it leaves unfixed. Mark every figure that is a projection rather than an actual.
Now make the reasoning visible. An options table with hidden assumptions is a guess in a suit.
Prompt t9-b goalMake the assumptions under this comparison explicit.
contextTwo of these options rest on the November and December pattern repeating, and one rests on a volume band we have not reached yet.
sourcesThe comparison and the performance data behind it.
expectationsList each assumption, what it would take to test it, and how the recommendation changes if it turns out to be wrong. Say which single assumption carries the most weight.
Turn the objection back on your own recommendation before your manager does.
Prompt t9-c goalArgue against my recommendation using the customer’s own words.
contextTheir procurement manager is procedural, checks what she can, and already said this out loud in front of the VP who signs.
sourcesThe comparison and the transcript.
expectationsThe three strongest objections she can raise, in the language she used. For each, the answer I can support with evidence, and where I have no answer yet.
Move to Word and write the note Lynne actually reads.
Prompt t9-d goalTurn this into a one-page decision note for my sales manager.
contextLynne Robbins owes the customer an answer inside two weeks and will make the call herself. She wants the decision, not the analysis.
sourcesThe comparison and the assumptions.
expectationsThe recommendation in the first sentence. Then the options in one line each, the assumption it rests on, the risk of being wrong, and what I need her to decide. Under one page.
Save the note. Task 10 uses the same evidence to look forward instead of back.
Check your work
- The recommendation is in the first sentence, not the last.
- Every figure is marked as an actual or a projection.
- Each option names the assumption it depends on.
- The strongest objection appears in the note, with your answer to it.
- There is one decision asked of Lynne, not three.
Stretch prompts
Starting out — get the shape:
Compare three options for a service the customer says they
should not have to pay for: include it free, hold the price,
or defer it. One line each on cost, benefit and risk.
Comfortable — find the breaking point:
At what point does bundling this service free stop being
worth it to us? Give me the volume, the margin and the number
of accounts where the answer flips, and say which of those I
can actually check.
Confident — argue the other side:
Write the case for holding the price, as our finance lead
would make it to Lynne Robbins. Then tell me which part of
that case my recommendation does not answer.
Tip
The habit here is naming the assumption. A recommendation that says "peak volume repeats" out loud can be checked and corrected. One that assumes it silently cannot, and it fails in December when nobody remembers who decided what.